Year 2025 / Volume 32 / Number 1

Original

Use of capsaicin 8 % patch in refractory chronic neuropathic pain: study of two cases series

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2025; 32(1): 29-45 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2026.4212/2025

Gerardo Correa, Gerardo Correa, Ruperto Correa, Ana María Torres, César Margarit


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Despite the multiple oral and interventional treatments available, localized neuropathic pain remains undertreated and has low response rates. Topical treatment has emerged as an alternative for various patient populations with localized neuropathic pain.
Objectives: To evaluate the results of repeated use of capsaicin patch 8 % (PC8) in localized neuropathic pain in daily clinical practice, assessing the response through spontaneous pain, mechanical allodynia and treated painful area. Study design: observational, retrospective, descriptive case series study. Setting: all patients were treated with PC8 at Clínica RedSalud Providencia or Hospital Clínico Mutual de Seguridad CChC, Santiago de Chile between 2022 and 2024.
Methods: Patients with probable or definite localized neuropathic pain, 'irritable nociceptor' sensory profile (static or dynamic mechanical allodynia), and DN4 Questionnaire ≥ 3/7 were selected. The primary outcome of therapeutic efficacy was the decrease in spontaneous pain intensity, mechanical allodynia and size of the painful area between baseline and the last treatment. Improvement in quality of life, reduction of concomitant consumption of oral analgesics and tolerability of the drug were also evaluated. Monthly evaluations were performed, with periodic applications of PC8 following European standards and according to the technical file. Quality of life was evaluated with the EuroQoL-5D-3L scale.
Results: Of 12 patients analyzed, in two series of six each, the first presented post-traumatic/post-surgical painful scars with neuropathic component ('Scars'), and the second, post-herpetic neuralgia ('PHN'). Three or four applications of PC8 were performed every 3 months, with an average follow-up of 10 months in each series. The entire 'Scars' series had a ≥ 30 % reduction in baseline spontaneous pain intensity and half had ≥ 50 % reduction. In addition, with respect to mechanical allodynia intensity, half presented ≥ 30 % decrease, and ⅓ of the sample ≥ 50 %. All patients presented painful area contraction ≥ 50 %. In the 'PHN' series, with respect to baseline spontaneous pain intensity, ⅔ of patients had a reduction ≥ 30 % and half had a reduction ≥ 50 %. Likewise, regarding mechanical allodynia intensity, half had a reduction ≥ 30 % and 1 patient (17 %) decrease ≥ 50 %. All patients presented painful area contraction ≥ 50 %. 80 % of patients in the 'Scars' series and 40 % in the 'PHN' series reduced opioid consumption due to combination of oral treatment with PC8. All patients improved their quality of life and 11/12 patients (83 %) were reintegrated socially and occupationally at the end of treatment.
Discussion: It is suggested that the capsaicin 8 % patch is a valuable option for the treatment of localized neuropathic pain, providing a significant reduction in spontaneous pain intensity, mechanical allodynia and painful area. In addition, it reduces the consumption of oral drugs, particularly opioids, and improves quality of life, accompanied by good tolerability. This research has limitations inherent to a retrospective study and includes a small number of patients, so prospective studies with similar methodology and population, but with a larger sample size, are suggested.



RESUMEN

Introducción: A pesar de los múltiples tratamientos orales e intervencionistas disponibles, el dolor neuropático localizado sigue siendo infratratado y presenta tasas de respuesta reducidas. El tratamiento tópico se ha constituido como una alternativa para diversas poblaciones de pacientes con dolor neuropático localizado.
Objetivos: Evaluar los resultados del uso repetido del parche de capsaicina al 8 % (PC8) en dolor neuropático localizado en la práctica clínica diaria, valorando la respuesta mediante dolor espontáneo, alodinia mecánica y área dolorosa tratada. Diseño del Estudio: estudio observacional, retrospectivo, descriptivo de series de casos. Lugar: todos los pacientes fueron tratados con PC8 en Clínica RedSalud Providencia o en Hospital Clínico Mutual de Seguridad CChC, Santiago de Chile entre 2022 y 2024.
Métodos: Se seleccionaron los pacientes con dolor neuropático localizado probable o definitivo, perfil sensitivo de ‘nociceptor irrititable’ (alodinia mecánica), y Cuestionario DN4 ≥ 3/7. El resultado primario de la eficacia terapéutica fue la disminución de la intensidad del dolor espontáneo, alodinia mecánica y tamaño del área dolorosa entre el estado basal y el último tratamiento. Se evaluó, además, mejoría en la calidad de vida, reducción de consumo concomitante de analgésicos orales y tolerabilidad del fármaco. Se realizaron evaluaciones mensuales, con aplicaciones periódicas de PC8 siguiendo las normas europeas y según la ficha técnica. Se evaluó calidad de vida con escala EuroQoL-5D-3L.
Resultados: De 12 pacientes analizados, en dos series de seis cada una, la primera presentó cicatrices dolorosas postraumáticas/postquirúrgicas con componente neuropático (‘Cicatrices’), y la segunda, neuralgia postherpética (‘NPH’). Se realizaron 3 o 4 aplicaciones de PC8 cada 3 meses, con seguimiento promedio de 10 meses en cada serie. Toda la serie ‘Cicatrices’ tuvo una reducción ≥ 30 % intensidad del dolor espontáneo basal y la mitad presentó reducción ≥ 50 %. Además, respecto a la intensidad de alodinia mecánica, la mitad presentó disminución ≥ 30%, y un tercio de la muestra ≥ 50 %. Todos los pacientes presentaron reducción del área dolorosa ≥ 50 %. En la serie ‘NPH’, respecto a la intensidad del dolor espontáneo basal, dos tercios de los pacientes tuvieron una reducción ≥ 30 % y la mitad una reducción ≥ 50 %. Asimismo, en relación con la intensidad de alodinia mecánica, la mitad tuvo una reducción ≥ 30 % y 1 paciente (17 %) disminución ≥ 50 %. Todos los pacientes presentaron reducción del área dolorosa ≥ 50 %. El 80 % de los pacientes de serie ‘Cicatrices’ y el 40 % de serie ‘NPH’ redujeron el consumo opioide gracias a combinación del tratamiento oral con PC8. Todos los pacientes mejoraron su calidad de vida y 11/12 pacientes (83 %) se reinsertaron socio-laboralmente al final del tratamiento.
Discusión: Se sugiere que el parche de capsaicina 8 % es una opción valiosa para el tratamiento del dolor neuropático localizado, proveyendo una reducción significativa de la intensidad del dolor espontáneo, alodinia mecánica y área dolorosa. Además, reduce el consumo de fármacos orales, particularmente opioides, y mejora la calidad de vida, acompañándose de buena tolerabilidad. Esta investigación tiene limitaciones inherentes a un estudio retrospectivo e incluye un pequeño número de pacientes, por lo que sugerimos la realización de estudios prospectivos con similar metodología y población, pero con mayor tamaño muestral.





Complete Article

Nuevo comentario

Security code:
CAPTCHA code image
Speak the codeChange the code
 

Comentarios

No comments in this article

Bibliografía

1. Treede RD, Jensen TS, Campbell JN, Cruccu G, Dostrovsky JO, Griffin JW, et al. Neuropathic pain: redefinition and a grading system for clinical and research purposes. Neurology. 2008;70(18):1630-5.
2. Torrance N, Smith BH, Bennett MI, Lee AJ. The epidemiology of chronic pain of predominantly neuropathic origin. Results from a general population survey. J Pain. 2006;7(4):281-9.
3. Bouhassira D, Lanteri-Minet M, Attal N, Laurent B, Touboul C. Prevalence of chronic pain with neuropathic characteristics in the general population. Pain. 2008;136:380-7.
4. Bilbeny N, Miranda JP, Eberhard ME, Ahumada M, Méndez L, Orellana ME, et al. Survey of chronic pain in Chile - prevalence and treatment, impact on mood, daily activities and quality of life. Scand J Pain. 2018;18:449-56.
5. Gálvez R, Navez ML, Moyle G, Maihöfner C, Stoker M, Ernault E, et al. Capsaicin 8% Patch Repeat Treatment in Non-diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A 52-week, Open-label, Single-arm, Safety Study. Clin J Pain. 2017;33(10):921-31.
6. Lee SS, Yosipovitch G, Chan YH, Goh CL. Pruritus, pain, and small nerve fiber function in keloids: A controlled study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;51:1002-6.
7. Bijlard E, Uiterwaal L, Kouwenberg CA, Mureau MA, Hovius SE, Huygen FJ. A Systematic Review on the Prevalence, Etiology, and Pathophysiology of Intrinsic Pain in Dermal Scar Tissue. Pain Physician. 2017;20(2):1-13.
8. Backonja M, Wallace MS, Blonsky ER, Cutler BJ, Malan P Jr, Rauck R, et al. NGX-4010, a high-concentration capsaicin patch, for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a randomised, double-blind study. Lancet Neurol 2008;7(12):1106-12.
9. Anand P, Bley K. Topical capsaicin for pain management: therapeutic potential and mechanisms of action of the new high-concentration capsaicin 8 % patch. British Journal of Anaesthetics 2011;107(4):490-502.
10. Freynhagen R, Baron, Huygen F, Perrot S. Narrative review of the efficacy and safety of the high-concentration (179 mg) capsaicin patch in peripheral neuropathic pain with recommendations for clinical practice and future research. Pain Rep. 2025;10(2):e1235.
11. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Qutenza European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). Doc. Ref.:EMEA/629172/2009 EMEA/H/C/909 [Internet] [consultado 31 enero 2025]. Disponible en: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/es_ES/document_library/EPAR_-_Summary_for_the_public/human/000909/WC500040448.pdf
12. Pérez C, Rodríguez MJ, Guerrero A, Margarit C, Martín-Estefanía C, Oteo-Álvaro A, Caballero F. Consenso experto sobre el uso clínico de los tratamientos por vía tópica en el manejo del dolor neuropático periférico. Rev Soc Esp Dolor. 2013;20(6):308-23.
13. Giaccari LG, Aurilio C, Coppolino F, Pace MC, Passsavanti MB, Pota V, Sansone P. Review: Capsaicin 8 % Patch and Chronic Postsurgical Neuropathic Pain. J Pers Med. 2021;11:960.
14. Abd-Elsayed A, Pope J, Mundey DA, Slavin KV, Falowski S, Chitneni A, et al. Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of Painful Scar: A Narrative Review. J Pain Res. 2022;15:925-37.
15. Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94(2):149-58.
16. Mick G, Baron R, Correa-Illanes G, Hans G, Mayoral V, Frías X, et al. Is an easy and reliable diagnosis of localized neuropathic pain (LNP) possible in general practice? Development of a screening tool based on IASP criteria. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30(7):1357-66.
17. Mayoral V, Pérez-Hernández C, Muro I, Leal A, Villoria J, Esquivias A. Diagnostic accuracy of an identification tool for localized neuropathic pain based on the IASP criteria. Curr Med Res Opin. 2018;34(8):1465-73.
18. Bouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, Boureau F, Brochet B, Bruxelle J, et al. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain. 2005;114(1-2):29-36.
19. Perez C, Galvez R, Huelbes S, Insausti J, Bouhassira D, Diaz S, Rejas J. Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the DN4 (Douleur Neuropathique 4 questions) questionnaire for differential diagnosis of pain syndromes associated to a neuropathic or somatic component. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:66.
20. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;37:53-72.
21. Badia X, Roset M, Montserrat S, Herdman M, Segura A. La versión española del EuroQol: descripción y aplicaciones. Med Clin (Barc). 1999;112(Supl 1):79-86.
22. Haanpää M, Cruccu G, Nurmikko TJ, McBride WT, Docu Axelarad A, Bosilkov A, et al. Capsaicin 8 % patch versus oral pregabalin in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. Eur J Pain. 2016;20(2):316-28.
23. Irving GA, Backonja MM, Dunteman E, Blonsky ER, Vanhove GF, Lu SP, et al. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled study of NGX-4010, a high-concentration capsaicin patch, for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. Pain Med 2011;12(1):99-109.
24. Schlereth T. Guideline "diagnosis and non interventional therapy of neuropathic pain" of the German Society of Neurology (deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie). Neurol Res Pract. 2020;2:16.
25. Allegri M, Baron R, Hans G, Correa-Illanes G, Mayoral Rojals V, Mick G, Serpell M. A pharmacological treatment algorithm for localized neuropathic pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(2):377-84.
26. Mainka T, Malewicz NM, Baron R, Enax-Krumova EK, Treede RD, Maier C. Presence of hyperalgesia predicts analgesic efficacy of topically applied capsaicin 8% in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. Eur J Pain. 2016;20(1):116-29.
27. Baron R, Maier C, Attal N, Binder A, Bouhassira, D. Peripheral neuropathic pain: a mechanism-related organizing principle based on sensory profiles. Pain. 2017; 158(2):261-72.
28. Maihöfner C, Heskamp ML. Prospective, non-interventional study on the tolerability and analgesic effectiveness over 12 weeks after a single application of capsaicin 8% cutaneous patch in 1044 patients with peripheral neuropathic pain: first results of the QUEPP study. CMRO. 2013;29(6):673-83.
29. Freynhagen R, Argoff C, Eerdekens M, Engelen S, Perrot S. Progressive Response to Repeat Application of Capsaicin 179 mg (8% w/w) Cutaneous Patch in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: Comprehensive New Analysis and Clinical Implications. Pain Med. 2021;22(10):2324-36.
30. Tenreiro Pinto J, Pereira FC, Loureiro MC, Gama R, Fernandes HL. Efficacy analysis of capsaicin 8% patch in neuropathic peripheral pain treatment. Pharmacology 2018;101:290-7.
31. Gustorff B, Poole C, Kloimstein H, Hacker N, Likar R. Treatment of neuropathic pain with the capsaicin 8% patch: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) in a prospective observational study identifies potential predictors of response to capsaicin 8% patch treatment. Scand J Pain. 2013;4:138-45.
32. Vieira IF, de Castro AM, Loureiro MDC, Pinto J, Cardoso C, Assuncao JP. Capsaicin 8% for peripheral neuropathic pain treatment: a retrospective cohort study. Pain Physician. 2022;25:E641-7.
33. Webster LR, Tark M, Rauck R, Tobias JK, Vanhove GF. Effect of duration of postherpetic neuralgia on efficacy analyses in a multicenter, randomized, controlled study of NGX-4010, an 8% capsaicin patch evaluated for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. BMC Neurology. 2010;10:92.
34. Mankowski C, Poole CD, Ernault E, Thomas R, Berni E, Currie CJ, et al. Effectiveness of the capsaicin 8 %patch in the management of peripheral neuropathic pain in European clinical practice: the ASCEND study. BMC Neurol. 2017;17(1):80.
35. Gonçalves D, Rebelo V, Barbosa P, Gomes A. 8 % Capsaicin Patch in Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain. Pain Physician. 2020;23:E541-E548.
36. Mullins CF, Walsh S, Rooney A, McCrory C, Das B. A preliminary prospective observational study of the effectiveness of high- concentration capsaicin cutaneous patch in the management of chronic post-surgical neuropathic pain. Ir J Med Sci 2022;191(2):859-64.
37. Lanteri-Minet M, Perrot S. QAPSA: post-marketing surveillance of capsaicin 8 % patch for long-term use in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain in France. Curr Med Res Opin 2019;35(3):417-26.
38. Santos MP, Lemos F, Gomes J, Roma˜ o JM, Veiga D. Topical capsaicin 8% patch in peripheral neuropathic pain: efficacy and quality of life. Br J Pain. 2024;18(1):42-56.
39. Maihöfner CG, Heskamp ML. Treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain by topical capsaicin: impact of pre-existing pain in the QUEPP-study. Eur J Pain. 2014;18(5):671-9.
40. Bischoff JM, Ringsted TK, Petersen M, Sommer C, Uçeyler N, Werner MU. A capsaicin (8%) patch in the treatment of severe persistent inguinal postherniorrhaphy pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e109144.
41. Pickering G, Engelen S, Stupar M, Ganry H, Eerdekens M. Is the Capsaicin 179 mg (8% w/w) Cutaneous Patch an Appropriate Treatment Option for Older Patients with Peripheral Neuropathic Pain? J Pain Res. 2024;17:1327-44.
42. Finnerup NB, Attal N, Haroutounian S, McNicol E, Baron R, Dworkin RH, et al. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(2):162-73.
43. Moisset X, Bouhassira D, Attal N. French guidelines for neuropathic pain: An update and commentary. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2021;177(7):834-7.
44. Derry S, Rice ASC, Cole P, Tan T, Moore RA. Topical capsaicin (high concentration) for chronic neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;1(1): CD007393.

Artículos relacionados

The role of low-dose radiotherapy in the management of arthrosis pain: narrative literature review

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2024; 31(3): 157-164 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2025.4105/2023

Predisposing factors for chronic post-surgical pain. Narrative review

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2024; 31(1): 32-39 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2024.4131/2024

Persistent headache after craniotomy for meningioma: charting of the afferent pathways for nociception: a discussion

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2023; 30(3): 191-195 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2023.4069/2023

Prevalence of glossodynia. Burning mouth syndrome and associated risk factors in the population of Ciudad Real

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2023; 30(1): 15-29 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2023.4045/2022

Treatment of painful scars with 5 % lidocaine patch: clinical cases report

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2022; 29(3): 187-191 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2022.3997/2022

Use of 8 % capsaicin patches for the treatment of lumbar neuropathic pain

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2022; 29(1): 28-33 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2022.3995/2022

Retrolaminar ultrasound guided block as analgesic treatment for post herpetic neuralgia: case report

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2021; 28(6): 350-353 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2022.3920/2021

Capsaicin: a treatment to pick the mouth

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2021; 28(5): 252-253 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2021.3961/2021

Evolution of low back pain in cancer patients treated with interventional pain management

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2021; 28(2): 76-81 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2021.3901/2021

Interventional management of osteoarthritic pain

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2021; 28(13): 85-90 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2021.3853/2020

Intra-articular botulinum toxin and ozone in osteoarthritis

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2021; 28(13): 73-79 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2021.3857/2020

Transitional pain clinic

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2020; 27(6): 369-374 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2020.3840/2020

Opioid misuse in patients with cancer pain: an integrative systematic review of the literature

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2020; 27(5): 306-315 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2020.3801/2020

Pain: a "hotchpotch"

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2020; 27(4): 278-280 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2016.3507/2016

Orofacial pain in the dental clinic

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2019; 26(4): 233-242 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2019.3724/2019

Myofascial pain syndrome as a cause of postoperative acute pain in hip surgery

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2019; 26(2): 117-119 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2019.3655/2018

New indication of capsaicin 8 % patch: painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2019; 26(1): 60-61 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2017.3556/2016

Changes in intraocular pressure in patients with trigeminal neuralgia subject to radio frequency of the Gasserian ganglion

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2018; 25(6): 342-348 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2018.3657/2018

Proctalgia and pudendal nerve entrapment: an association to know

Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor. 2018; 25(6): 311-317 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2018.3623/2017

Prevalence of breakthrough pain associated with chronic low back pain in Andalusia (COLUMBUS study)

Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2017; 24(3):116-124 / DOI: 10.20986/resed.2017.3548/2016

Instrucciones para citar

Correa G, Correa G, Correa R, Torres A, Margarit C. Use of capsaicin 8 % patch in refractory chronic neuropathic pain: study of two cases series. Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2025; 32(1): 29-45 / DOI: 1020986/resed20264212/2025


Descargar a un gestores de citas

Descargue la cita de este artículo haciendo clic en uno de los siguientes gestores de citas:

Métrica

Este artículo ha sido visitado 2 veces.
Este artículo ha sido descargado 0 veces.

Estadísticas de Dimensions


Estadísticas de Plum Analytics

Ficha Técnica

Recibido: 13/05/2025

Aceptado: 04/01/2026

Prepublicado: 07/01/2026

Publicado: 24/02/2026

Tiempo de revisión del artículo: 83 días

Tiempo de prepublicación: 239 días

Tiempo de edición del artículo: 287 días


Compartir

Este artículo aun no tiene valoraciones.
Reader rating:
Rate this article:
© 2026 Revista de la Sociedad Española del Dolor
ISSN: 1134-8046   e-ISSN: 2254-6189

      Indexada en: